728x90_newspapers_dark_1.gif
Showing posts with label Mercury. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mercury. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Brown promises austere budget at forum focused on education - San Jose Mercury News

SACRAMENTO -- Gov.-elect Jerry Brown had some words of advice for those gearing up for the budget he will propose next month: "Please sit down if you're reading the stories on the budget on Jan. 10. If you're driving, fasten your seat belt because it's going to be a rough ride."

That much has been evident from the hard truths Brown continued to unleash Tuesday at UCLA during a forum focusing on where education fits in the state's overall revenue picture. It was his second budget forum in seven days, and Brown made it clear that few people will emerge unscathed as the Legislature seeks a way out of a potential $28.1 billion hole.

After being cheered at the start of the forum, Brown said, "I don't know if you'll be cheering after the budget comes out."

But Brown also telegraphed what some took to be hints that he is laying the groundwork to take a tax hike initiative to voters in the spring.

"I think the signals are clear that he'll push through an austerity budget with an all-cuts budget early in the year, and he'll say if you don't like it, here are the revenues we need," said Robert Cruickshank, editor of the liberal Calitics.com blog.

Brown said he wanted to complete the budget in 60 days, saying, "I don't think we have a lot of time to waste" -- a hint suggesting that he would like to allow the bad news of harsh cuts time enough to sink into voters' minds before a spring special election.

"Where

I see openings that will pave the way for positive initiative, then I'm going to lead the charge," Brown said. "But I'd want to do it very carefully and very thoughtfully because I want to make sure we succeed."

Brown even drifted into soliloquies that warmed the hearts of liberals, referring to California's deficit as a fraction of the state's overall wealth and talking about the harmful effects of the "redistribution" of income to the wealthy.

"Income redistribution that's occurred upward from the middle class and below is now at a level comparable to pre-Depression 1920s," he said. "So what we are facing is not only a budget deficit. We're facing a societal crisis, and we will only resolve it as we understand it and we work not only to exercise a discipline, which has been sadly lacking, but also a fairness that enables everybody to feel they have an honest stake in the whole society. That's the larger picture here."

He called the current era, with widening gaps between the wealthy and middle class, "a very difficult period. We've never had it before. It may be worse than the Depression in terms of political pressures, the tearing of the social fabric."

Those who are the most privileged, he said, "really have to take the lead" in resolving the fiscal crisis. He said that group includes government agencies, which can do "a lot more with less."

Education officials urged Brown to seek tax increases to lift a downcast education system that has taken $17 billion in general fund cuts over the past two years.

"Temporary taxes need to be extended," said Joel Shapiro, superintendent for South Pasadena schools. "Absolutely, we can't do without revenues. We need to educate the voters of California "... that the only way to keep the education system from deteriorating worse is to increase revenues, taxes or fees."

But Brown appeared slightly miffed at the tone Shapiro took toward voters.

"You say we've got to educate them -- in some ways, they've got to educate us," Brown said. "It's not really a we/them. It's society. There's a lot of hostility to government. They look at the city of Bell, they pick up the paper and see firefighters getting a $250,000 pension. There's a lot of skepticism about government in the political process. That's a reality and we have to take the world as we find it and we have to work through it."

James Johnson, a Long Beach councilman, asked Brown how he intends to figure out the contradiction voters have between their desire to fully fund schools and their hostility to taxes.

Brown answered, partly in jest: "That's why we're here -- we're hoping one of you people will come up with it. We didn't gather here just to hear ourselves speak."

One dilemma, he said, was that the state tries to make sense out of competing outlooks from regions that have little in common -- an argument, he said, for shifting many of the state's responsibilities to local governments.

"When we take so many local decisions and put them all at the state Capitol, then we have all these different perceptions working on the problem," he said. "That's why we get a lot of breakdown and gridlock. Because people see the world differently."

One indication of how he'd like to "offload costs" from state to local: There are 45,000 inmates who are incarcerated for 90 days or fewer in state prisons who he said could be housed in county institutions at a lower cost.

Contact Steven Harmon at 916-441-2101.


View the original article here

Sunday, January 30, 2011

San Jose bans plastic bags - San Jose Mercury News

San Jose became the largest U.S. city to ban plastic carry-out bags Tuesday with an ordinance that supporters said was the most far-reaching in the country aimed at encouraging shoppers to bring reusable totes.

The ordinance, approved on a 10-1 vote after two years of study, would become effective Jan. 1, 2012 to allow for more public outreach. It would prohibit retailers from giving out disposable plastic carry-out bags at the checkstand and require them to charge for paper bags.

"This is a great step," said Councilman Sam Liccardo. "It's an opportunity to lead on an important environmental issue."

Councilman Pete Constant, the lone dissenter, said the council had "increased the burden and cost for people in the midst of one of the deepest recessions we've experienced in our lifetime."

Reactions from downtown shoppers was mixed.

"I don't have a whole lot of money to be charged for paper bags," said Pine Watt, 18, a freshman at San Jose State University.

Nimfa Sanchez, 74, was walking into the San Fernando Street Safeway from a downpour and wondered how she would fare without waterproof plastic bags.

"How am I going to run after my groceries that roll out of a paper bag on a night like this?" asked Sanchez, who uses a walker. "Besides, I already recycle."

But Julianna Iran, 24, who was examining lettuce at the Safeway, pronounced the idea "terrific. If it's going to cost money to get a paper bag, I'll be

more likely to bring my cloth bag."

And Luke Vong, 47, a civil engineer walking out of the store with a double plastic bag filled with groceries, called the ban "good for the environment."

Subhead

Opinions also varied inside the council chambers. Samantha Dabish, representing the Neighborhood Market Association, urged the council to include an exemption for smaller stores she said would face higher costs from the ban. But Timothy James of the California Grocers Association said grocers appreciated amendments woven into the ban to allow bags for pharmaceuticals and meats.

San Jose isn't the first city to ban plastic bags; San Francisco led the way in 2007. But San Jose's ordinance goes farther than others, said David Lewis, executive director of the environmental group Save the Bay.

The ordinance covers most retailers, not just groceries and pharmacies, and discourages disposable paper bags by requiring merchants to charge customers for them. He said the city ordinance will be a model for other cities and counties.

Lewis called disposable plastic bags "one of the most visible and unsightly forms of pollution in the bay." He said the Bay Area uses 3.8 billion plastic bags a year and about 1 million end up in San Francisco Bay, where they harm birds, fish and other animals.

Lisa Bickford, 46, of San Jose came to show her support for a ban by attending the meeting in a "bag monster" costume made out of 500 disposable plastic bags .

"I live to be 1,000 years old, and I am synthetic so I break down slowly," Bickford said in mock protest. "I will be here long after any of you."

Critics like the American Chemistry Council, which represents plastic bag makers, say their product is being unfairly maligned, noting it can be recycled and turned into things like shopping carts and composite lumber. They say government officials should promote bag recycling rather than bans.

But Lewis said recycling hasn't worked, with only about 5 percent recycled in California.

"People consider it trash, not something of value," he said. "That's why it ends up on the street."

Industry lobbying has helped thwart efforts to ban plastic bags statewide. A state Assembly bill to ban single-use plastic carry-out bags from grocery and drug stores died this year for lack of support in the Senate, despite backing from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

But that has only spurred local bans. In addition to San Francisco, Palo Alto, Oakland, Malibu and Los Angeles County have approved similar measures, while Fremont, Sunnyvale, Marin County and Santa Clara County are among those considering them.

Opponents have sued or threatened litigation against some cities over plastic bag bans, arguing that they only encourage use of disposable paper sacks. Plastic bag backers contend paper is more environmentally harmful because of deforestation and the energy needed to manufacture wood pulp.

Lawsuits and legal threats over bans in Oakland, Palo Alto and Fairfax argued the cities should have conducted a full analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act before taking action. Oakland suspended its ban; Fairfax, in Marin County, made it voluntary. And Palo Alto agreed in a settlement to conduct a complete environmental review if it expands its ban beyond grocers.

San Jose's ban underwent a full environmental analysis, which Councilman Kansen Chu says will make it more legally sound. Chu pushed for the city to pass a bag law after returning from a trip to Taiwan, where merchants charge customers for disposable carryout bags.

Subhead

The chemistry council also argued the measure would violate restrictions on fees that voters approved in November under Proposition 26. But City Attorney Rick Doyle disagreed because the city doesn't receive the paper bag fee; merchants do.

The ordinance exempts restaurants and nonprofit second-hand stores such as the Salvation Army. City officials said paper or reusable bags may be impractical for carrying moist, messy take-out foods, and that second-hand stores already reduce waste by encouraging people to reuse things.

The ban also doesn't prohibit plastic bags made available to protect meat, produce or bulk foods, nor does it prohibit sales of sandwich or trash bags.

Retailers could face fines of $500 to $1,000 for violating the ordinance.

Mayor Chuck Reed urged environmentalists and neighborhood groups to keep track of how many bags wind up in city creeks after the ban, saying, "It's really important to demonstrate that we've addressed the problem."

Mercury News Staff Writer Tracy Seipel contributed to this report. Contact John Woolfolk at 408-975-9346.

Starting Jan. 1, 2012, retailers cannot offer disposable plastic carry-out bags at the check stand.
Retailers must charge at least 10 cents to provide disposable paper carry-out bags; that rises to 25 cents by 2014. There are exemptions for food-stamp recipients.
Restaurants and nonprofit second-hand stores are exempted.Source: City of San Jose


View the original article here

Thursday, January 6, 2011

Biz Break: From Apple, $458 iPads; plus: more Black Friday in... - San Jose Mercury News

Today: Apple has cut prices on the iPad for today only. In Silicon Valley, malls are crowded, but consumers say they're being careful with their spending. Plus: More Apple news, Del Monte, Silicon Valley tech stocks.

Black Friday deals

It's the day after Thanksgiving, and (as is our holiday weekend custom) we're glad we're working today and not battling the Black Friday crowds at Silicon Valley's favorite malls, big-box retailers and shopping districts.

If we wanted an iPad (hey, we've contributed a lot to Apple's revenue stream already this year), we'd be super-stoked to know that the Cupertino maker of Mac computers and "i" devices has included the new tablet computer

among its own online Black Friday specials.

Apple has reduced iPad prices by $41, the iPod touch by $21 to $41, the iPod nano by $11 to $21, and computers including the iMac, MacBook Pro and the 13-inch MacBook Air by $101.

If you want a new flat-panel TV, this is a good time to buy, according to our friends at The Associated Press. A supply glut will bring prices down sharply from last holiday season, according to the AP report.

Here in Silicon Valley, shoppers were up early this morning. The Merc and our Bay Area News Group siblings have a small army of reporters tracking the frenzy.

While consumer hot spots such as Westfield Valley Fair, Santana Row and Stanford Shopping Center have been busy, many shoppers say they're being careful with their spending this season.

"It's getting crowded earlier," Valley Fair shopper Debbie Fumia of Los Gatos told a Merc reporter this morning. "I think it's the hype. I have a 17-year-old. He left at 7:30 -- a half-hour before me. He said he and his girlfriend want to experience Black Friday. They are not shopping. They are coming for the experience."

Holiday headlines

Here's some Bay Area business news you may have missed since Wednesday afternoon:

Apple: The rapidly growing company has bought more land in Cupertino, according to a Merc report. A spokesman confirmed that Apple bought a 98-acre site on Pruneridge Avenue from tech giant Hewlett-Packard, which is consolidating employees at its Palo Alto headquarters.

The land is adjacent to a 50-acre site Apple bought last year. Both properties are just a short drive from Apple's Infinite Loop headquarters campus off De Anza Boulevard.

"We now occupy 57 buildings in Cupertino and our campus is bursting at the seams," Apple spokesman Steve Dowling told a Merc reporter. "These offices will give us more space for our employees as we continue to grow."

Neither Apple nor HP revealed the purchase price, although HP reportedly had sought as much as $300 million.

Del Monte Foods: The San Francisco company agreed to a $19-a-share buyout by private equity firms Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, Vestar Capital Partners and Centerview Partners. The deal is valued at $5.3 billion, including $1.3 billion in debt.

Del Monte Foods' stock finished trading today at $18.83, up 84 cents, or 4.7 percent, from Wednesday's closing price.

Silicon Valley tech stocks

Up: Apple, Cisco Systems.

Down: Google, Oracle, Intel, HP, eBay, VMware, Gilead Sciences, Yahoo.

The tech-heavy Nasdaq composite index: Down 8.56, or 0.3 percent, to 2,534.56.

The blue chip Dow Jones industrial average: Down 95.28, or 0.9 percent, to 11,092.00.

And the widely watched Standard & Poor's 500 index: Down 8.95, or 0.7 percent, to 1,189.40.

The New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq ended regular trading early today.

Check in weekday afternoons for the 60-Second Business Break, a summary of news from Mercury News staff writers, The Associated Press, Bloomberg News and other wire services. Contact Frank Russell at 408-920-5876. Follow him at Twitter.com/mercspike.


View the original article here

Saturday, December 25, 2010

Is Facebook about to offer email? Reports say it plans a 'Gmail... - San Jose Mercury News

Print   Email   Font ResizeBy Mike Swift

mswift@mercurynews.com

Posted: 11/12/2010 07:31:19 PM PSTUpdated: 11/13/2010 12:21:13 PM PST
Facebook may be on the verge of offering e-mail to the 500 million members of its social-networking site, making it the largest e-mail service on the planet.

More significantly, the offering could lead to a fundamental transformation of e-mail. Yahoo, Google and Microsoft are already scrambling to retool their e-mail services to build them more around people's social connections. Facebook would have a tremendous advantage because it owns a vast trove of data about people's relationships and would find it easier to graft e-mail onto its existing social services such as photo-sharing.

Facebook has invited the media to what appears to be a significant announcement in San Francisco on Monday morning, adding a

prominent hint that the news could involve a new e-mail service -- a press invitation bears a message icon. However, while tech blogs hummed Friday with speculation that Facebook will release "a Gmail killer," the Palo Alto-based company declined to confirm or deny those rumors, and a source with knowledge of the social network's plans said at least part of the speculation was incorrect -- adding even more uncertainty.

If it is announced, a Facebook e-mail service would allow its more than 500 million members to communicate with anyone inside or outside the walls of the social network. If they use it, Facebook would leapfrog the 361 million global users of Windows Live Hotmail, Yahoo Mail's 273 million users and Gmail's 193 million

users, according to comScore.

However, a Facebook e-mail service would be most remarkable not for the size of its network, but for how it could use its web of social connections to transform one of the oldest -- and perhaps still the most important -- functions of the Internet.

"There is a huge opportunity for these guys to fundamentally change the nature of e-mail," said Matt Cain, an analyst for the research firm Gartner who expects Facebook to unveil an external e-mail service Monday.

Imagine, Cain said, a Facebook system that could prioritize mail from any external source based on the closeness of your relationship to the sender, or that allows you to easily flip a one-to-one e-mail exchange into a conversation with a group of friends.

Facebook now offers an internal message service that is less functional than most Web-based e-mail, and only allows members to communicate with other Facebook accounts. But Facebook may hope to use a new external e-mail service to capture even more adherents, said Augie Ray, senior analyst for social computing for Forrester Research. Forrester says that while about 90 percent of U.S. adults check e-mail regularly, only 59 percent use social networking tools such as

(PrintExpress PDF Export. - IPA S)Facebook or Twitter.

An e-mail service "makes sense just largely from a reach perspective. Facebook has grown so large that we forget that it still has room for growth," Ray said.

And by adding e-mail to the Internet's most popular photo-sharing service, smartphone location-sharing service and social gaming site, Facebook would make an even stronger claim as a hub of personal communications, placing "Facebook as much into competition with AT&T as it is now with Google," Ray said.

The tech blog TechCrunch first reported in February that Facebook was working on an e-mail service, internally dubbed "Project Titan." And while it is possible that Monday's announcement will be something more modest, both TechCrunch and VentureBeat claimed Friday to have confirmed the e-mail service with anonymous sources.

Google and Yahoo are working to make e-mail more reflective of people's personal connections by adding social-networking features to existing e-mail services. Google had disastrous results when it based its Google Buzz social-networking service on people's Gmail contacts, running into a privacy Waterloo when it automatically imported people into the service. Yahoo, the most popular U.S. e-mail provider, recently launched a new version of Mail that allows users to broadcast their status on both Twitter and Facebook -- just as if they were actually on those sites.

Unhappy with Facebook's unwillingness to let people export their contacts from Facebook into a service like Gmail, Google last week blocked Facebook from allowing users to import their Google contacts directly into the social network.

Gmail is the hot property in e-mail right now, with its global audience up 21 percent during the 12 months ending in September, while Yahoo Mail and Hotmail have both lost share, according to comScore data.

Given Gmail's momentum, a Facebook e-mail service "puts tremendous pressure on Google," Cain said. "Gmail is the place to be, and all of sudden, in one fell swoop, Facebook can enable e-mail for 500 million users, and I would suspect there is a huge overlap."

Contact Mike Swift at 408-271-3648. Follow him at Twitter.com/swiftstories.

Print   Email   Font ResizeReturn to Top  

View the original article here

Saturday, October 16, 2010

Cassidy: Facebook s Mark Zuckerberg could build the education network - San Jose Mercury News

Print   Email   Font ResizeBy Mike Cassidy

Mercury News Columnist

Posted: 10/07/2010 12:16:35 PM PDTUpdated: 10/07/2010 02:28:16 PM PDT
So, I'm sitting in a dimly lit theater in Palo Alto waiting for Superman.

Not the one who wears a red cape. The one who wears a blue hoodie. Silicon Valley boy wonder, Mark Zuckerberg, star of stage, screen, "The Simpsons," Facebook and the universe in general, has invited a few of his 500 million friends to a special movie screening.

No. Not that movie. "The Social Network," Alan Sorkin's fictionalized account of the rise of Facebook and the guy who either invented it or stole it, is not what this night is about. This night is about education and "Waiting for Superman," a documentary that those looking to save our schools hope will do for the education disaster what "An Inconvenient Truth" has done

for the global warming disaster.

And Zuckerberg? He has a chance to become the education CEO, the guy who lubricates the national conversation with star power and tons of cash. He's a billionaire at 26, which gets people's attention -- even in Silicon Valley, where an army of entrepreneurs has made money nearly as fast as they've made progress.

Last month -- on Oprah, no less -- Zuckerberg dropped $100 million on the Newark, N.J., school system. The nationally televised largesse coincided with the run-up to the unflattering portrayal of Zuckerberg in "The Social Network," which opened to rave reviews and box-office supremacy. Naturally, cynics questioned the coincidence. Could it be that the man they call Zuck was trying to counter

the bad vibes from the Facebook blockbuster with a sudden spasm of philanthropy?

A lot to think about in a dimly lit theater as we wait for superman, who does stroll in (sans hoodie) and does exactly the right thing. He picks up a microphone to welcome the educators, community leaders, journalists, friends -- and he makes a joke.

"I'm not really inviting a lot of people to go to the movies right about now," Zuckerberg says, "but I thought this one was pretty important."

The crack filled the theater with laughter and cleared the air over whether Zuckerberg was going to spend much time worrying about those who question his motives. Not that it hasn't been a concern at Facebook HQ.

Larry Yu, Facebook's corporate communications director, told me before the Wednesday screening that the company's public relations staff didn't think announcing Zuckerberg's big gift just as the bothersome biopic was being released was such a hot idea.

"We recommended against the timing," Yu says, "because we thought it would be construed as an obvious ploy."

Which is pretty much how it was construed. But the time was right for New Jersey and two of its prominent politicians -- Gov. Chris Christie and Newark Mayor Cory Booker -- who teamed up to join forces with Zuckerberg on the education initiative.

And so, it seems Facebook watchers (which is pretty much all of us, right?) are left with a choice: We can see Zuckerberg as a cynical and manipulative billionaire working overtime to spin public opinion. Or we can see him as an incredibly young and fabulously rich man who decided he would start giving away his money much earlier in life than some of those who have gone before him.

Alternatively, you can adopt my take, which is: Who cares? Who cares what motivates a guy to give millions to K-12 education? If you do care, I've got two words for you: Bill Gates. In the late 1990s, when Gates started paring his staggering wealth through philanthropy, he was blistered. The billionaire monopolist was simply buying his way into heaven, critics cried. His generosity was just a way to take the heat off Microsoft, which was being skewered in public opinion and the courts for being anti-competitive.

And maybe it was pure PR. But who cares? Gates just kept giving, and I'd like to hear a coherent argument now that the man doesn't believe in what he's doing, which is helping run the world's largest charitable foundation.

Zuckerberg is young. He's connected. He has a platform to encourage other moguls to follow his lead.

Yu says he doesn't know whether his boss has decided to make K-12 education his signature philanthropic cause. But in the dimly lit theater, Zuckerberg talks about how he wants his $100 million to spur innovations and initiatives that can be replicated across the country.

Here's hope then that Superman's help could be coming to a school district near you.

Contact Mike Cassidy at mcassidy@mercurynews.com or 408-920-5536. Follow him at Twitter.com/mikecassidy.

Print   Email   Font ResizeReturn to Top  

View the original article here