728x90_newspapers_dark_1.gif

Sunday, October 31, 2010

Mark Zuckerberg 'Likes' Facebook SNL Skit - TechCrunch


After this weekend’s Saturday Night Live/Facebook double header, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg posted a Hulu link on his Facebook profile pointing to his faux guest appearance on “Weekend Update,” with the status “Andy Samberg plays me on SNL. I’m a big Andy Samberg fan so I thought this was funny.”

While having a sense of humor is pretty much a necessity if you are at the forefront of pop culture (and yes a top grossing Hollywood movie about you currently in theaters as well as not one but two skits about your company on SNL is pretty much that), I think it’s particularly funny that Zuckerberg found the following lines funny.

“So Mark you went and saw The Social Network? Don’t be ridiculous, I’m 26 I stole it online.”

“I had three friends, because parents count. Do turtles count? No. Okay then, just the three.”

“I invented Facebook Seth, I didn’t invent getting successful to meet girls. I guarantee that the first thing the guy who invented the wheel did was roll up over some ladies … We’re men, we use what we’ve got.”

“I went on Oprah and I donated 100 million dollars to the Newark school system … Of course I did that to look good after the movie! What does it matter, it was a 100 million dollars, that’s hoverboard money!”

“I may not like what it says but its a really good movie.”

“Sean Parker gets Justin friggin Timberlake and I get Jesse Eisenberg. It’s like, hey we’re making a movie about Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. Steve you’re going to be played by Brad Pitt and Bill you’re going to played by a cardboard box with glasses on it.”

“My one regret for Facebook is ‘poking.’ Poking is creepy and lame and getting an email that your dad poked you is an enormous bummer.”

Well, maybe Zuckerberg didn’t find all of it funny, as he does expresses some confusion about the “hoverboard money” part, which former Facebook Senior Platform Manager and current Path co-founder Dave Morin found “definitely clutch” (Kimberly Parker helpfully explains). But hopefully Zuckerberg’s appreciation of the skit means we will see a less annoying alternative to poking in the near future.

Side note: Mad props to Paul Jeffries for his “Ali G Pitches A VC” reference, which is funnier than both the SNL skits combined. And apologies to our foreign readers for the Hulu embeds.


View the original article here

Love can ease pain, say brain researchers - BBC News

13 October 2010 Last updated at 20:29 ET Pain Researchers believe love can act as a painkiller Love hurts, at least according to many a romantic songwriter, but it may also help ease pain, US scientists suggest.

Brain scans suggest many of the areas normally involved in pain response are also activated by amorous thoughts.

Stanford University researchers gave 15 students mild doses of pain, while checking if they were distracted by gazing at photos of their beloved.

The study focused on people early in a romance, journal PLoS One reported, so the "drug of love" may wear off.

The scientists who carried out the experiment used "functional magnetic resonance imaging" (fMRI) to measure activity in real-time in different parts of the brain.

It has been known for some time that strong feelings of love are linked to intense activity in several different brain regions.

These include areas linked to the brain chemical dopamine, which produces the brain's feel-good state following certain stimulants - from eating sweets to taking cocaine.

"Light up"

The Stanford University researchers had noticed that when we feel pain, some of the same areas "light up" on the scans - and wondered whether one might affect the other.

They recruited a dozen students who were all in the first nine months of a relationship, defined as "the first phase of intense love".

Each was asked to bring in a picture of the object of their affection and photos of what they deemed an equally attractive acquaintance.

Continue reading the main story
It's important to recognise that people who feel alone and depressed may have very low pain thresholds, whereas the reverse can be true for people who feel secure and cared for”

End Quote Professor Paul Gilbert University of Derby While their brains were scanned, they were shown these pictures, while a computer controlled heat pad placed in the palm of their hand was set up to cause them mild pain.

They found that viewing the picture of their beloved reduced perceptions of pain much more than looking at the image of the acquaintance.

Dr Jarred Younger, one of the researchers involved, said that the "love-induced analgesia" appeared to involve more primitive functions of the brain, working in a similar way to opioid painkillers.

"One of the key sites is the nucleus accumbens, a key reward addiction centre for opioids, cocaine and other drugs of abuse.

"The region tells the brain that you really need to keep doing this."

Professor Paul Gilbert, a neuropsychologist from the University of Derby, said that the relationship between emotional states and the perception of pain was clear.

He said: "One example is a footballer who has suffered quite a painful injury, but who is able to continue playing because of his emotionally charged state."

He added that while the effect noticed by the Stanford researchers might only be short-lived in the early stages of a love affair, it may well be replaced by something similar later in a relationship, with a sense of comfort and wellbeing generating the release of endorphins.

"It's important to recognise that people who feel alone and depressed may have very low pain thresholds, whereas the reverse can be true for people who feel secure and cared for.

"This may well be an issue for the health service, as patients are sometimes rushed through the system, and perhaps there isn't this focus on caring that might have existed once."


View the original article here

Thrilling Chilean miners rescue was made for TV - USA Today

Thrilling Chilean miners rescue was made for TV It was like a moon landing or the Super Bowl or the most gripping reality TV show you've ever seen. The rescue of 33 miners from what had seemed like their tomb below the Chilean desert was the culmination of a mythic tale of death and resurrection that briefly unified the world in awed delight.After 69 days — longer than some real-life reality TV shows — viewers were transfixed by a rolling climax of happy reunions.

In an age accustomed to made-for-cable TV stories, "this was another level," says Rich Hanley, a journalism professor at Quinnipiac University in Hamden, Conn. "You didn't need to speak English or Spanish to understand what you were seeing."

The story had elements that make for engrossing viewing or reading: men trapped underground; their anxious waiting families; a passionate nation; a resourceful, international rescue team. As it ended, there were laughs, hugs, tears and prayers.

The rescue inspired those who work below ground and those who've worked far above it. Leroy Chiao, a former NASA astronaut who flew on three space shuttle flights, was impressed by the miners' teamwork and how they tried to improve their lives more than 2,000 feet underground, "which keeps your mind from going places you don't want it to go."

At the other extreme was Ken Reinhart, a safety manager for Con Edison in New York City, who has inspected tunnels 10 stories underground. He felt a kinship with the miners: "It's something you always think about. Anyone who's ever been on an elevator lift that malfunctions knows a little bit of that feeling. It hits you, how far underground you are."

About 8.5 million viewers watched coverage of the first rescue late Tuesday on the three major cable networks, compared with an average audience for the preceding three hours of 6.2 million. CNN doubled its audience at 11 p.m. ET.

Actor Michael Caine was "watching the happiest moment I've ever seen on TV," according to his Twitter feed. "Miracles do happen," tweeted pop singer Justin Bieber. David Blaine, the showman who in 1999 was entombed in an underground plastic box for seven days, told CNN the miners' survival was "absolutely mind-blowing."

In New York, Chilean-born restaurant manager Jaime Rodriguez felt pride in his native land. Watching on his computer as the first miner surfaced, he says, "I cried a little bit." Seeing them emerge as if from death, "I felt a little like I was born again."

The story had these classic elements:

A great story line

Mine rescues are a staple of cable TV news. This was something else: Never had so many been trapped so low for so long and emerged alive.

"They were trapped underground, in a place like hell itself — claustrophobic, dark, fetid — and they come up like they were resurrected," says Robert Thompson, a professor of television and popular culture at Syracuse University. "Western civilization doesn't come up with stories much better."

"The story was building for 69 days," Hanley says. "Will they make it? We were all waiting for that capsule to come up."

A big story early in the TV cable news era was the rescue of "Baby Jessica" McClure after the toddler fell into a well in Midland, Texas, in 1987. She was pulled up an 8-inch-wide casing after 58 hours. "This was Baby Jessica times 33," Thompson says.

Suspense

Although the rescue team had taken elaborate precautions, the result was not pre-ordained. AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka, a miner like his father and grandfather, calls it "a rare blessing when the earth gives back up those that it has trapped."

Davitt McAteer, former director of the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration, says a claustrophobic miner could have moved violently during the ascent and jammed the capsule; the cable could have snagged; or the rig pulling the cable could have overheated.

"You can be good and you can be lucky. And they've been good and lucky," he says.

In such cases, things can go either way.

In 2002, nine miners were rescued after being trapped underground for 78 hours at the Quecreek Mine in Somerset County, Pa. Coming less than a year after the 9/11 attacks, the miners' survival seemed like a national morale boost.

In 2006, a coal mine explosion at Sago, W.Va., trapped 13 miners for nearly two days. Although many news organizations — relying on incorrect, unofficial information — reported that 12 survivors had been found alive, only one survived.

And this year, on April 5, 29 miners were killed at the Upper Big Branch coal mine in Montcoal, W.Va., the worst accident of its kind in the U.S. in 40 years. One of the two survivors was Stanley Stewart, who was watching the Chile drama on television.

He cheered the miners' rescue but feared for their recovery. "After the initial joy they'll have some issues they'll have to deal with," he told CNN. "Flashbacks ... nightmares. They'll still need help."

He said he spoke from experience: "The best part of me's still up on that mountain. I want me back."

Good news in a time of bad

"We have a good-news deficit in this world," says Kitty Thurmer, 56, of Washington, D.C., for whom the mine rescue evoked America's pride in the moon landing in 1969. "This is a human, tactile event we can share electronically. It's a shared joy."

Had the accident occurred in the United States, its coverage might have been different — characterized by discussion of possible mining company infractions or government regulatory failings. But the Chilean news media focused on the positive.

"This was in sharp relief to things like the response to (Hurricane) Katrina, or to political attack ads," Hanley says.

The cast of characters

The miners included some memorable personalities. "Super Mario" Sepulveda was the second miner to emerge. His shouts were heard even before the capsule rose above the surface, and he bounded out of the lift and thrust a fist upward like a boxer. He hugged his wife and handed out souvenir rocks from the mine to laughing rescuers.

Yonni Barrios, dubbed "Dr. House," had paramedic training that allowed him to help care for his fellow miners. He's also known for his complicated personal life; his wife and his mistress had met while waiting at the mine site.

Omar Reygadas, an electrician who helped organize life underground, became a great-grandfather for the fourth time a month after the mine collapse.

Mario Gomez, at 63 the oldest of the men and a miner since age 12, dropped to his knees after he emerged from the Phoenix capsule, bowed his head in prayer and clutched the Chilean flag.

They were men to whom anyone with a father or brother or son could relate.

"I have kids," said Nina Snow, 35, a mother of three from Potomac, Md., who watched on a huge TV screen outside the Chilean Embassy in Washington. A tear ran down her cheek. "If anything happened to my husband — it's so amazing " she said. Beyond that, she couldn't find the words.

Chilean pride

The crisis united Chile. Its pride was infectious.

Arturo Fermandois, Chile's ambassador to the U.S., says his nation was proud of the technical and professional prowess demonstrated in the rescue. "This rescue was led by a team formed entirely by Chileans," he says. "The engineers, the miners and most of the technology is Chilean."

The crisis was an opportunity, he says, "a window to show the world the quality of Chileans. Sometimes it's difficult to show how good Chileans are, how good are our professionals."

No one represented the country better than the miners, he says: "When we found them after 17 days, we found them in good condition because they were able to organize themselves. They managed not to eat all the food, and in a peaceful way."

Exceptional media access

Viewers were able to see live video from within the mine, and shots of miners' relatives, including children, before and during the reunions.

Juan Carlos Troncoso, a manager at a Chilean TV station broadcasting the rescue, says the Chilean government granted the news media access that seemed unusual by U.S. standards.

Troncoso's wife, Soledad Urzua, on vacation with him in Washington, said the Chilean public demanded it: "We, the public, wanted to know their daily lives, how they eat, how they're living day to day. In Chile, it's always like that. When there's an earthquake, people want to know."

Hanley says the coverage reflected Chilean President Sebastian PiƱera's background in television. "You would not have seen this kind of access in China," which has been plagued by mine deaths, he adds. "There might have been just one feed, and it might have been delayed or edited."

An engineering feat

"It was a triumph of engineering and can-do," says Hanley. And it had an American angle. The rescue operation included a driller operator from Denver and a team from Berlin, Pa., that built and managed the piston-driven hammers that pounded the hole through quartz and silica.

Yet even after the last miner was lifted to safety, the drama's ending was unwritten. Having survived below, how would the 33 fare above?

There will be contracts for book and movie deals, job offers, personal appearances and speaking engagements — all of which could bring them previously unfathomable riches.

"Before being heroes, they are victims," University of Santiago psychologist Sergio Gonzalez told the Associated Press. "These people who are coming out of the bottom of the mine are different people ... and their families are, too."

Guidelines: You share in the USA TODAY community, so please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. Use the "Report Abuse" button to make a difference. Read more.

View the original article here

GOP Accelerates, but Bumps Remain - New York Times

By nearly every indication, Republicans stand to make big gains in the midterms and could sweep dozens of Democrats out of the House. With less than three weeks to go, there are only a limited set of variables and last-minute imponderables that could substantially alter the course of the election and give Democrats a better chance of holding off possible Republican control of the House and near parity or better in the Senate.

Democrats, while throwing in the towel in a few places, note that some of their vulnerable candidates are running close or ahead in polls, giving them hope that their firewall will hold. Yet if they are to retain the House and Senate, Democrats need help on multiple fronts and from Republicans themselves, who must still avoid serious mistakes, misjudgments and a sense of complacency if they intend to occupy the speaker’s office.

THE VETTING CHALLENGE Among the lingering questions remaining for Republicans is whether their many untested and unvetted challengers can navigate the next few weeks without an embarrassing disclosure, public gaffe or brutal debate slip-up as voters focus more closely on the battle for Congress.

New revelations of a candidate who occasionally dressed up as a Nazi officer and the high-profile filing of a sexual harassment lawsuit against another already have Republicans pessimistic about their chances for two Democratic seats in Ohio they had hoped to swipe from Democrats.

Similar episodes could take more seats off the table and also hurt Republican hopefuls elsewhere by reinforcing an overarching Democratic theme that Republicans are unqualified and not ready to govern. Many Republicans remember how the late fall House page scandal dashed their chances of holding the House in 2006.

THROW THEM ALL OUT Another unpleasant thought nagging at Republicans is that more of their own incumbents than believed could be at risk from voters eager to toss out established politicians of both parties, not just majority Democrats. In the House takeover years of 1994 by Republicans and 2006 by Democrats, no incumbent of either triumphant party lost.

Democrats say they believe they can pick off four or five Republican seats and perhaps more, increasing the overall number of seats Republicans would need to claim a majority and conceivably making the difference between majority and minority.

Republicans say they expect surprises on Nov. 2, but not enough to change the overall outcome since they predict some Democrats will be caught unaware as well.

“I fully expect that we will wake up after Election Day and have lost an incumbent or two or a seat that we didn’t expect and so will they,” said Carl Forti, a former top aide at the National Republican Congressional Committee who is serving as political director at the advocacy group American Crossroads.

THE OTHER CHOICE The rise of the Tea Party and other activist groups, while generally a boon to Republicans this year, is also threatening to limit the party’s gains as Election Day looms. Third-party candidates who refused to make way for Republican hopefuls could siphon voters away from them and throw some close races to Democrats in places like Virginia, Florida and Colorado.

FIRING UP THE BASE As for Democrats, they still have some ways to influence the outcome. President Obama is set to begin a coast-to-coast campaign swing on Friday in hopes of rallying the voters who flocked to Democrats in 2008 and closing the enthusiasm gap that has favored Republicans this year.

Democrats also have a get-out-the-vote effort that even Republicans acknowledge is superior, though they say its benefits will be limited in a year when Republican voters are already so highly motivated that they need no prodding to vote.

David Plouffe, a political adviser to the Democratic National Committee who ran Mr. Obama’s campaign two years ago, acknowledged the difficult headwinds facing the party and its candidates for the House, Senate and governor. But he said a well-organized turnout operation and a closer inspection of Republican candidates could cause many races to tighten.


View the original article here

Christine O'Donnell: How'd she do? - CNN

Republican Christine O'Donnell and Democrat Chris Coons face off in a debate Wednesday.Republican Christine O'Donnell and Democrat Chris Coons face off in a debate Wednesday.O'Donnell, Coons face off in first debateO'Donnell has largely avoided the national mediaShe came across as aggressive, but stumbled on a question about Supreme Court casesImmediate reaction form the blogosphere was mixed

Washington (CNN) -- Before Wednesday's Delaware Senate debate, the bulk of what people knew about Republican candidate Christine O'Donnell came from clips from a talk show from the 1990s.

In the month since O'Donnell rocked the political world with her upset win over Rep. Mike Castle in the Republican primary, she's dominated headlines despite avoiding the national media.

Wednesday's debate, co-moderated by CNN's Wolf Blitzer and longtime Delaware news anchor Nancy Karibjanian, could prove to be make or break for O'Donnell's Senate bid. She and Democrat Chris Coons are vying to fill the seat held for nearly four decades by now-Vice President Joe Biden

The debate gave O'Donnell an opportunity to reintroduce herself to voters, define her views and chip away at the 19-point deficit she must overcome to defeat Coons. It also provided a chance to do the opposite.

O'Donnell and Coons focused largely on the economy and national issues during their 90-minute exchange.

Updates from Delaware

O'Donnell threw rocks at Coons throughout the debate, while he tried to paint her answers as frivolous and unintelligible.

"Coons can can barely contain his disdain for his opponent," noted Gloria Borger, a senior political analyst for CNN.

The debate produced a few humorous moments, such as when Coons said O'Donnell's well-publicized statements that she dabbled in witchcraft and questioned evolution theory were distractions instead of a substantive campaign issue.

"You're just jealous that you weren't on Saturday Night Live," O'Donnell said, referring to the comedy show's satirical skit about her.

"I'm dying to see who's going to play me," Coons responded with a smile.

The debate was tense and O'Donnell was feisty -- until a flub near the end.

O'Donnell was tripped up by the same question that caused problems for then-VP candidate Sarah Palin in her interview with Katie Couric about Supreme Court decisions.

Asked if she could name a recent Supreme Court case she disagreed with, O'Donnell said "can you give me a specific one?"

O'Donnell was unable to provide a case, but said decisions she disagreed with would be posted on her website.

While the forum was one of the most anticipated events of the campaign season, not everyone was as captivated.

"Even if I lived in [Delaware] I wouldn't watch. I already know about this woman to question everything she has done. Her ethics and character leave a lot to be desired," commented CNN reader Marie MD.

Commenter Laverne planned to tune in for the entertainment. "Anybody in their right mind will be able to tell right away if she is truly knowledgeable of the topics," the reader said.

Immediate reaction from the blogosphere was also mixed.

The Conservative Journal said the debate "didn't have a clear cut winner as far as who answered better," but it predicted O'Donnell would benefit most in the aftermath.

The blog gave credit to both candidates for substantive answers, but was turned off by Coons "snide retorts."

The left-leaning blog Talking Points Memo said that while O'Donnell may have mastered her talking points, she "had a tough time this evening with some basic questions about issues she'd face if she is elected to the Senate."

How do you think she did? Did O'Donnell win or lose votes based on her performance?


View the original article here