US, China work on Chinese currency deal - USA Today

Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.

View the original article here

Iraq Coalition Pact Hits Snags - Wall Street Journal

Iraq Coalition Pact Hits Snags - WSJ.com More BigCharts Virtual Stock Exchange WSJ Asia WSJ Europe WSJ Portuguese WSJ Spanish WSJ Chinese WSJ Japanese WSJ Radio Financial News WSJ Lifestyle Brands WSJwine SEARCH Wednesday, October 20, 2010 As of 2:45 AM EDT | The Wall Street Journal World Welcome, Logout My Account My Journal Help Message Center ( new)
U.S. Edition Home ? More

WSJ.com is available in the following editions and languages:

U.S. Asia India China Japan Europe Americas en Español em Português Register for FREE Register for FREE Thank you for registering.

We sent an email to:

Please click on the link inside the email to complete your registration

Please register to gain free access to WSJ tools.

An account already exists for the email address entered.

Forgot your username or password?

This service is temporary unavailable due to system maintenance. Please try again later.

The username entered is already associated with
another account. Please enter a different username

The email address you have entered is already in use.
Please re-enter the email address.

First Name Last Name Email (your email address will be your login)Confirm Email Create a Password Confirm Password Company Size (Optional) Please make a selection 1-99 100-499500-9991,000-2,4992,500-4,9995,000-9,99910,000-14,99915,000-24,99925,000+Not Applicable

From time to time, we will send you e-mail announcements on new features and special offers from The Wall Street Journal Online.

Create a profile for me in the Journal Community

Why Register?

Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions

As a registered user of The Wall Street Journal Online, you will be able to:

Setup and manage your portfolio

Personalize your own news page

Receive and manage newsletters

Login/Register to set your edition Today's Paper Video Blogs Journal Community

Log In Log In Login Password Log in Your login is either a username or an email address.

Keep me logged in. Forgot your password?

World » More

World » More

Loading… U.S. » More

U.S. » More

Loading… New York » More

New York » More

Loading… Business » More

Business » More

Loading… Markets » More

Markets » More

Loading… Tech » More

Tech » More

Loading… Personal Finance » More

Personal Finance » More

Loading… Life & Culture » More

Life & Culture » More

Loading… Opinion » More

Opinion » More

Loading… Careers » More

Careers » More

Loading… Real Estate » More

Real Estate » More

Loading… Small Business » More

Small Business » More

Loading… Asia China Japan India Europe U.K. Russia Middle East Africa World Markets The Fight for Iraq Close

Dow Jones Reprints: This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers, use the Order Reprints tool at the bottom of any article or visitwww.djreprints.com

See a sample reprint in PDF format.Order a reprint of this article nowMIDDLE EAST NEWSNOVEMBER 11, 2010, 2:31 P.M. ETIraq Coalition Pact Hits Snags ArticleCommentsmore in World »BY BEN LANDO, SAM DAGHER AND MARGARET COKER

BAGHDAD—Iraqi lawmakers took the first steps toward implementing a power-sharing agreement to establish a coalition government, but a dispute in parliament late Thursday underscored the fragility of the deal.

The agreement would see Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, a Shiite, keep his position, give a role to his chief rival, Ayad Allawi, who led a secular bloc that represents Iraq's Sunnis, and keep the presidency in the hands of Kurdish leader Jalal Talabani.

Late Thursday, after lawmakers elected a speaker of parliament representing Mr. Allawi's Iraqiya bloc, a disagreement emerged over the bloc's demands, and Iraqiya lawmakers walked out before the ...

Email Printer Friendly Order Reprints Share:

facebook

Twitter

Digg

StumbleUpon

Viadeo

Orkut

Yahoo! Buzz

Fark

Reddit

LinkedIn

del.icio.us

MySpace

  Related StoriesIraq News and Analysis: Attacks Persist as Iraqi Politicians Meet 09-Nov-2010 12:01:00 amIraq Nears Power-Sharing Deal 11-Nov-2010 12:01:00 am Zalmay Khalilzad: How to Outmaneuver Iran in Iraq 10-Nov-2010 12:01:00 am

Subscriber Content Read Preview

Fresh Attacks Target Iraq's Christians 10-Nov-2010 03:22:00 pmLeaked Documents Roil Iraq 25-Oct-2010 12:01:00 amIraq Prime Minister Calls Report Political 23-Oct-2010 01:00:00 pmIraq Wrangling Threatens Iran's Influence Over Shiite Leaders 05-Oct-2010 05:59:00 amIraqis Face Uncertain Future as U.S. Ends Combat Mission 27-Aug-2010 12:01:00 amRelated Videos16-Aug-2010 10:04:00 pmAllawi breaks off talks with al-Maliki11-Nov-2010 09:05:00 amU.S., S.Korea Down to Wire on Trade - News Hub24-Oct-2010 02:06:00 pmBahrain Shiite opposition wins 18 of 40 parliament seats

Copyright 2010 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit

www.djreprints.com

Back To Back ToMSN Money HomepageMSN Money InvestingMost Popular ReadEmailedVideoCommentedSearches1.Deficit Panel's Leaders Push Cuts2.Obama-Boehner Rift Looms3.Samsung's Rival to the iPad4.Ireland's Fate Is Tied to Banks5.Karl Rove: Obama Has a Listening Problem1.Deficit Panel's Leaders Push Cuts2.Opinion: Henninger: The 1099 Democrats3.Man Cave Makeover4.Karl Rove: Obama Has a Listening Problem5.When 1,400 Come for Dinner1.Mossberg: Sizing Up Samsung's Galaxy Tab2.Mikhail Baryshnikov's New York Retreat3.AM Report: U.S., S.Korea Down to Wire on Trade4.PM Report: Panel's Tough Medicine on Spending5.News Hub: Geithner, Greenspan Spar on Weak Dollar1.Opinion: California: The Lindsay Lohan of States814 comments2.Deficit Panel's Leaders Push Cuts731 comments3.Sarah Palin Takes Aim at Fed564 comments4.Opinion: The GOP's Racial Challenge480 comments5.Obama Reaches Out to Muslim Ally404 comments 1. Facebook 2. economy 3. Apple 4. Mad Men 5. China Most Read Articles Feed Most Emailed Feed Most Popular Video Feed Most Commented FeedMost Popular Feeds Latest Tweets Follow

"A Question of Taste http://on.wsj.com/cSdgUe"

Moments ago from WSJEuropeBiz (WSJ Europe Business)

"Novartis Halts Cancer Study: Novartis said it will halt studies on an experimental lung-cancer drug in favor... http://on.wsj.com/aRifID"

Moments ago from WSJEurope (WSJ Europe News)

"U.K. to Tape Traders' Talk on Cell Phones http://on.wsj.com/9MYl8M"

Moments ago from WSJUK (WSJ U.K.)

"Obama, Hu Stake Positions on Yuan: The U.S. and Chinese presidents, meeting on the sidelines of the G-20 sum... http://on.wsj.com/8XvxjL"

6 min ago from WSJEurope (WSJ Europe News)

"Powerful Blast Kills 15 in Karachi: A massive bomb explosion shook Pakistan's financial capital Karachi Thur... http://on.wsj.com/cfdosb"

37 min ago from WSJEurope (WSJ Europe News) Editors' PicksObama-Boehner Rift LoomsDino De Laurentiis, Legendary Film Producer, Dies at 91CMA Awards 2010: Can Gwyneth Paltrow Sing Country?Bush Wades Into Fannie, Freddie DebateCan a Guy Look Cool in a Cardigan?Penney Tries to Carve New NichesFor Town Cops, It's a Dog's LifeVideoprevious next Clinton: West Bank Settlements 'Counterproductive'2:13 Muslim Pilgrims Commence Haj1:30 George W. Bush's 'Souvenir' From Saddam1:05 Most Recommended CommentsComments CommentersCommenters 1. “I continually hear comments like...;” - Eric Nelson 172 Recommendations 2. “Taking the La Lohan analogy...;” - David Pearlman 143 Recommendations 3. “California will be the first...;” - Thomas Bates 109 Recommendations 4. “"Here is an old tradition...;” - David Pearlman 85 Recommendations 5. “Ms. Noonan, at least Governor...;” - Jay Savan 76 Recommendations Greg Liautaud 952 Recommendations Peter Venetoklis 947 Recommendations Eric Nelson 802 Recommendations jean balloon 782 Recommendations David Pearlman 733 Recommendations More in WorldU.S., South Korea Fail to Seal PactObama, Hu Stake Positions on YuanIraq Inches Toward GovernmentG-20 Nears Pact; Tensions RemainFlood-Aid Donors Seek Assurances Latest Tweets Follow

"A Question of Taste http://on.wsj.com/cSdgUe"

Moments ago from WSJEuropeBiz (WSJ Europe Business)

"Novartis Halts Cancer Study: Novartis said it will halt studies on an experimental lung-cancer drug in favor... http://on.wsj.com/aRifID"

Moments ago from WSJEurope (WSJ Europe News)

"U.K. to Tape Traders' Talk on Cell Phones http://on.wsj.com/9MYl8M"

Moments ago from WSJUK (WSJ U.K.)

"Obama, Hu Stake Positions on Yuan: The U.S. and Chinese presidents, meeting on the sidelines of the G-20 sum... http://on.wsj.com/8XvxjL"

6 min ago from WSJEurope (WSJ Europe News)

"Powerful Blast Kills 15 in Karachi: A massive bomb explosion shook Pakistan's financial capital Karachi Thur... http://on.wsj.com/cfdosb"

37 min ago from WSJEurope (WSJ Europe News) null Email Newsletters and Alerts

The latest news and analysis delivered to your in-box. Check the boxes below to sign up.

WSJ.com Email Features News Alert In Today's Paper This Week's Most PopularSubmit The email address null is already associated with another account. Please enter a different email address:

Enter Your Email

Sign UpNew! To sign up for Keyword or Symbol Alerts click here.To view or change all of your email settings, visit the Email Setup Center.

Thank you !
You will receive in your inbox.

To view or change all of your email settings, visit the Email Setup Center. null Email Newsletters and Alerts

The latest news and analysis delivered to your in-box. Check the boxes below to sign up.

WSJ.com Email Features This Week's Most Popular On the Editorial PageSubmit The email address null is already associated with another account. Please enter a different email address:

Enter Your Email

Sign UpManage Email Preferences

Thank you !
You will receive in your inbox.

Manage Email Preferences Editors' PicksObama-Boehner Rift LoomsDino De Laurentiis, Legendary Film Producer, Dies at 91CMA Awards 2010: Can Gwyneth Paltrow Sing Country?Bush Wades Into Fannie, Freddie DebateCan a Guy Look Cool in a Cardigan?Penney Tries to Carve New NichesFor Town Cops, It's a Dog's Life WSJ Web Slice CONTENT LINKS TO ACTUAL PAGE CONTAINING WEB SLICE FUNCTIONALITY. 15back to top WSJ.com Account:My AccountSubscriber Billing InfoCreate an Account:Register for FreeSubscribe to WSJ.comSign up for WSJ ProfessionalHelp & Information Center:HelpCustomer ServiceContact UsNew on WSJ.comTour the new JournalAbout:News LicensingAdvertisingAdvertise LocallyConferencesAbout Dow JonesPrivacy Policy - UpdatedSubscriber Agreement & Terms of Use - UpdatedCopyright PolicyJobs at WSJ.comFuture Leadership ProgramWSJ.com:Site MapHomeWorldU.S.New YorkBusinessMarketsMarket DataTechPersonal FinanceLife & CultureOpinionAutosCareersReal EstateSmall BusinessStudent JournalCorrectionsTools & Formats:Today's PaperVideo CenterGraphicsColumnsBlogsTopicsGuidesAlertsNewslettersMobileiPadPodcastsRSS FeedsJournal Community- Message CenterWSJ on TwitterWSJ on FacebookWSJ on FoursquareMy JournalPortfolioDigital NetworkWSJ.comMarketwatch.comBarrons.comSmartMoney.comAllThingsD.comFINS: Finance, IT jobs, Sales jobsBigCharts.comVirtual Stock ExchangeProfessorJournal.comWSJ U.S. EditionWSJ Asia EditionWSJ Europe EditionWSJ India PageForeign language editions:WSJ ChineseWSJ JapaneseWSJ PortugueseWSJ SpanishACAP EnabledCopyright ©2010 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

View the original article here

Obama=Bush? - Boston Globe

var archivedState=0; (Globe Staff photo illustration )

Months before Election Day, the name of Jimmy Carter had assumed an incantatory power among observers of politics. President Obama’s supporters began to fret that his presidency was declining as Carter’s did, while his opponents salivated at the prospect, as though the more the 39th president was mentioned, the worse the chances of the 44th. In addition to columnists and bloggers, historians Walter Russell Mead and Sean Wilentz have written on the comparison, while Carter’s vice president, Walter Mondale, has worried over it. Carter himself recently discussed it with Larry King.

Is Obama the next Carter? Leaving aside for the moment the facility and myopia of this analogy — we’ve had 17 one-term presidents — its details are off. Obama and Carter are both Democrats, true, both are intellectuals who came into office on a wave of discontent, and both promised new approaches to government and the world. What candidates don’t? Obama seems to like Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu even less than Carter liked Menachim Begin, and Carter faced a crisis in Iran, a new eruption of terrorist threats, and economic woes, though all of very different sorts than those facing Obama.

But where Carter, a notorious micromanager and hand-wringer, appeared to bog down in the carpet fibers of the presidency, a common complaint about Obama is that he’s in the clouds. Where Carter was said to have a morose and pedantic outlook, Obama is accused of being, rather, cerebral and aloof — related charges, maybe, but not the same. Recounting Carter’s fumbling Mideast statecraft in his book “A World of Trouble,” Patrick Tyler described an “obsessive technocrat who wore his idealism like a crucifix and his pragmatism like a slide rule clipped to his waistband.” That’s not Obama.

Yet there is a recent one-term president he resembles. George H.W. Bush doesn’t often come up in discussions of Obama, but two years into Obama’s term, the two presidents’ tenures bear a striking resemblance. So too do their governing styles and temperaments, and even, unlikely though it may seem, their speech. Here are two leaders “buffeted by circumstance,” as the presidential historian Bert Rockman characterized Bush, whose same signal qualities in repulsing buffets and discussing them with the public — sobriety, patience, and, yes, prudence, to use Bush-impersonator Dana Carvey’s favorite Bushism — are often enough their least appreciated.

But why attempt the comparison at

all? Isn’t analyzing the doings of one White House frustrating enough? Were we able to travel back in time and stand behind each of the 44 presidents as they went about a day in office, we’d no doubt find the diversity of problems they faced and the ways they faced them makes drawing parallels laughable. Despite working in the Oval Office, each successive occupant of it is a nonpareil.

Still, the practice feels necessary. Why? Most simply, because comparison is how we learn, how we judge. Comparing Obama to Carter, even if it’s to express disfavor, is a way of fitting him into a group, of trying to understand him and the challenges of his job. It’s a way of familiarizing him. That Obama is the first African-American president makes this impulse all the stronger. Similarly, while presidents have been compared since John Adams succeeded George Washington, when we’re talking about a young president with scant public record prior to his election, past presidential performances are one of the few available yardsticks.

So let’s compare, first, those historical buffets. In the first year of Bush’s term, he was beset by three unforeseen calamities that are eerily resonant. First was the savings & loan crisis. Facilitated by deregulation and a mortgage bubble, the S&L crisis threatened the country’s banking system by the time of Bush’s inaugural. Unpopular though he knew the move would be, Bush and Congress put together a massive tax-funded rescue. The public didn’t understand the disastrous alternative scenario, and the move was assailed as a bailout of reckless bankers.

Then, in the spring of 1989, student-led protestors began assembling in Tiananmen Square in Beijing, and in June Chinese police and soldiers took to beating and murdering them. Like Obama, Bush came into office with higher than average respect from foreign leaders, but he had to shelve plans to improve American-Chinese relations, a blow to his larger ambitions to redefine American engagement with the Communist world. He cut off diplomatic ties to China after Tiananmen, but, a committed internationalist, he believed engagement was eventually the right strategy. He was roundly criticized for not doing enough to support the protestors.

That didn’t turn as many people against him as what was, until this year, the worst man-made natural disaster in American history. In March of 1989 the Exxon Valdez spilled hundreds of thousands of gallons of crude oil into Prince William Sound. Since “everybody now expects the man inside the White House to do something about everything,” as the presidential historian Richard Neustadt observed in his study “Presidential Power,” Bush, a former oilman, bore only somewhat less blame than Exxon.

Jump to 2009-10: The Troubled Asset Relief Program and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, otherwise known as the stimulus, are seen by many Americans as bailouts, not legitimate attempts to stave off economic catastrophe. (TARP was created by the George W. Bush administration, but according to recent polls two-thirds of Americans attribute it to Obama.) Obama, who has arrived in office with the hopes of foreign leaders and populations riding high, wants to redefine relations with, most of all, the Muslim world, but before he has the chance there are protests, and then violent crackdowns, in Tehran. (Unlike the crisis Carter faced in 1979, this was not a revolution, and the Iranian government was in no danger of crumbling.) He is criticized for not expressing enough support for the protestors, criticism that pales in comparison to that of his handling of the BP oil spill.

George H. W. Bush came into office facing what many economists called the worst economic downturn since the Depression, accompanied by a collapse in the real estate market and a Wall Street racked by scandal and stock market decline. He succeeded a president, Ronald Reagan, who staked his reputation on limited government while expanding it in certain costly areas, particularly the military, leaving record deficits. Though Bush would have liked to do more in domestic policy, he was constrained not just by money, but by a widespread public conviction, inflamed by Reagan, that government “is the problem.” Bush pollster Robert Teeter recognized this early on, seeing that while Americans were revolted by the “private interest” excesses of the Reagan era — as Bush himself was — they were also unwilling to embrace the “public purpose” alternative.

Twenty years later, Obama followed on the heels of a self-proclaimed Reagan Republican whose tenure ended in straits like those Reagan’s had. And Obama faced the same conundrum: He campaigned on the promise of a renewed sense of public purpose, and perhaps the most fundamental misreading of the public he made was thinking that what even many conservatives wanted, after George W. Bush, was not smaller government but rather more competent big government. Long before they’d occurred, the 2010 elections were deemed a rejection of that notion.

It’s little remembered now that a renewed sense of public purpose was also Bush’s hope. We recall with amused pity the phrases “a thousand points of light” and “a kinder, gentler America,” but those ideas meant something to Bush. He’d studied at the feet of the policy mandarins who surrounded his father, Connecticut Senator Prescott Bush, conservative men who nonetheless believed in the ability of government to improve people’s lives, a proposition Reagan made his name maligning. Though he first ran as a Goldwater conservative, as a young congressman — like Obama but unlike Carter, Reagan, Bill Clinton, and George W., he came out of the Legislature — Bush proved his mettle by bravely voting for Lyndon Johnson’s fair housing bill, after Johnson had announced he wasn’t seeking reelection, and over the objections of Bush’s incensed white Houston constituents.

In 1988, Bush could not run openly on reversing his predecessor’s policies, as Obama would later run against his son, but he did so tacitly. He was troubled by the rampant deregulation and decline in social services funding of the 1980s. Indeed, one slogan of his campaign, since forgotten, was “We Are The Change!” (add “we seek” to the end of that, and you have an oft-repeated slogan of the Obama campaign).

As president, Bush signed into law the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990. He put the full weight of the White House behind renewing the Clean Air and Water Acts (a coup Obama would be lucky to equal). He effected the first minimum wage increase in a decade. Most gallingly for his friends on Wall Street, in the wake of the S&L crisis he approved the most significant package of financial regulation reforms until 2010’s Consumer Financial Protection Act.

In his inaugural address, in which he studiously eschewed the folksy populism of Carter, Obama pledged that Americans were “ready to lead once more.” Similarly Bush predicted a “new world order” led by America, a phrase that would come to haunt him in the 1992 primaries. “Is George Bush merely an idealist or are there now plans underway to merge the interests of the US and the Soviet Union in the United Nations,” Pat Robertson drooled in his campaign book, “and install a socialist ‘world order’ in place of a free market system?” If that rings a bell, it may be because you’ve been watching clips of Glenn Beck.

There is also a rhetorical similarity between the two presidents. Obama is better spoken and more inspiring than was Bush, but, like Obama, Bush’s central rhetorical fault — how he eventually lost the public — was that he was always cool, always rational. He knew what he wanted, and what he’d done, but, like Obama, he was almost bashful about explaining as much to Americans, going so far as to cross many of the I’s out of his addresses. Bush press secretary Marlin Fitzwater lamented that his boss’s approach to message politics was “If I am doing the right thing, I can take any punishment.” Bush himself admitted, “I’m not good at expressing the concerns of a nation — I’m just not very good at it.”

Like Obama, Bush had a cerebral, deliberative, occasionally paradoxical way of speaking. In a fascinating study, “Personality Profiles of the 1992 Presidential Candidates as Derived from their Speech Patterns,” a pair of speech pathologists found that Bush’s most hobbling tendency as a speaker was not his well-known gaffes, which many people actually found endearing, but his Obama-esque fondness for retractors — “but,” “however,” “nevertheless,” and other such words that suggest active thought but also reversals of course.

The presidential historian Richard Hofstadter, who perfected the art of comparing chief executives, pointed out that the activity was a cultural necessity. “A longing to recapture the past, in fact, has itself been such a basic ingredient of the recent American past that no history of political thinking is complete which does not attempt to explain it,” Hofstadter wrote in “The American Political Tradition.” In other words, as Americans, we ply a kind of hyper-nostalgia. Hence every officeholder runs on the promise of restoring tradition, acknowledging as little as possible that America has many governmental traditions, not just one, a fact writ large in the presidency. It is said that nothing can prepare a candidate for the highest office. Maybe then we must compare presidents precisely because they are nonpareils? The presidency is an embodiment of so many traditions, a job of such power, of such complexity and thanklessness, there is no standard of measurement for it except itself.

This winter, Obama will face what promises to be a bitter debate over the deficit and taxes. Commentators will no doubt compare it to the budget battle of 1995-96, when Washington shut down. A better parallel, however, would be the fiscal debate Bush faced in 1990. More than anything, it proved the undoing of his presidency. Bush wrote in his diary at the time that he knew a decision to raise taxes might cost him reelection. He also knew that the cavalier spirit behind his “read my lips!” campaign pledge, while popular, was unwise — which is to say unlike George H.W. Bush. So he agreed to raise taxes.

Never mind that the deficit reduction bill he signed paved the way for the surpluses of the 1990s, or that his tax increase was actually smaller than an earlier one forced upon Reagan in percentage of gross domestic product: Republican legislators abandoned Bush over the decision. Their treacherous logic was voiced by Minnesota Congressman Vin Weber: “What is good for the president may well be good for the country, but it is not necessarily good for congressional Republicans. We need wedge issues to beat incumbent Democrats.”

If that sentiment sounds familiar, it’s because you encountered it a few weeks ago — but not from Republicans. It summed up the playbook of Democrats running for their lives, away from Obama’s policies. It resulted in the loss of the House of Representatives.

James Verini is a journalist in New York. You can read his work at http://www.jamesverini.com/.

© Copyright 2010 Globe Newspaper Company.

View the original article here