728x90_newspapers_dark_1.gif
Showing posts with label change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label change. Show all posts

Friday, January 7, 2011

DuPont, Zurich Chase $135 Billion Climate Market as Warming Forces Change - Bloomberg

Global Warming ‘Locked In’ as $135 Billion Market DuPont Co.'s drought-tolerant corn is one of the seeds that's designed to thrive where water is scarce. Photographer: Larry W. Smith/Bloomberg

PHILIPPINES DROUGHT A cow stands in a dried-up pond in Isabela province in the Philippines. Richer countries are negotiating a fund to help poorer nations cope with the changing climate conditions predicted by climate scientists. Photographer: Nana Buxani/Bloomberg

Seed maker DuPont Co., wind-turbine manufacturer General Electric Co. and insurer Zurich Financial Services AG are devising products to help the world adapt to climate change, a potential $135 billion-a-year market by 2030.

The companies are driven in part by the failure of international efforts to cut the greenhouse gases that scientists say contribute to global warming. Discussions last year in Copenhagen yielded little progress, and officials leading more than 190 countries in talks that begin today in Cancun, Mexico, say they don’t expect to achieve a binding agreement on measures to slow the growth of emissions.

Damages from climate-related disasters are mounting. Insured losses from storms and floods have risen more than fivefold to $27 billion annually in the past four decades, Swiss Reinsurance Co. said in a September report. By 2030, the world may need to spend $135 billion a year on flood protection, buildings that can withstand hurricanes and drought-resistant crops, Swiss Re said, citing United Nations data.

“Climate change presents a direct threat to our business,” Jim Hanna, director of environmental impact for Seattle-based Starbucks Corp., the world’s largest coffee chain, said in an interview. “We are already hearing some anecdotal evidence that shifting weather patterns and increased erosion and pest infestation are starting to impact coffee crops.”

Adaptation strategies, such as rewarding farmers for taking extra steps to prevent erosion on vulnerable land, will help Starbucks prepare, Hanna said.

Richer, Poorer Nations

Relatively rich nations such as the U.S. are devoting more attention and resources to adaptation and are negotiating a fund to help poorer countries cope with the higher sea levels, droughts, heat waves, more severe storms and erratic weather predicted by climate scientists.

“Sooner or later all businesses will have to climate-proof their operations,” Christiana Figueres, the UN’s climate chief, said in a September speech in New York. “Adaptation will be imperative if businesses want to avoid climate-change impacts that could drive them out of business.”

Crops better able to resist drought can help DuPont expand its $8.2 billion agriculture business, according to Jim Borel, vice president in charge of seed operations for the Wilmington, Delaware-based company, the world’s second-biggest seed maker behind Monsanto Co.

Farmers’ Productivity

“Real business opportunity comes from using science to help improve productivity for farmers, and they will have to do that to deal with climate change over the next few decades,” Borel said in an interview.

Zurich is offering policies letting businesses and homeowners replace storm-damaged property with structures better able to withstand extreme weather, said Lindene Patton, chief climate-protection officer for the Zurich-based insurer.

“There is more social demand on our customers and other stakeholders in the sense that when governments are not acting, people fill gaps with whatever tools are available,” Patton said.

The Cancun climate talks through Dec. 10, led by Figueres, will seek incremental steps after last year’s failure at meetings in Copenhagen to agree on a new binding international accord to cut heat-trapping greenhouse-gas pollution.

Even if nations were to implement ambitious emissions cuts now, some climate-change effects are unavoidable because of carbon dioxide already in the atmosphere, the Arlington, Virginia-based Pew Center on Global Climate Change said in an August report.

Effects Locked In

“There are climate impacts locked into the system because of the inertia of the atmosphere,” said Andrew Voysey, secretary of ClimateWise, an association of insurers based at the University of Cambridge in the U.K. that works to reduce the damage from climate change. “The increased focus on adaptation is certainly welcome, but we have to be quite conscious of the limits of what we can adapt out of.”

Lack of progress toward global cuts in carbon emissions means higher adaptation costs in the future, said Joel Smith, a principal at Boulder, Colorado-based Stratus Consulting Inc. and a lead author on U.N climate-change reports.

“The less we do to mitigate the more we’re going to have to deal with the consequences,” Smith said in an interview.

Nations have been slow to live up to commitments to help developing nations, said Frances Beinecke, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council, a New York-based environmental group.

“We have put some money on the table,” Beinecke said in an interview. “Not nearly enough. There’s going to be more and more conversations about adaption and the need to take it seriously.”

‘People Are Hurting’

Making the argument to spend millions of dollars today to deal with effects that may not be seen for decades is difficult, said Ruben Kraiem, a partner with the law firm Covington & Burling LLP in New York and an adviser to the Coalition for Rainforest Nations, a New York-based group that works to preserve tropical forests.

“When people are hurting as many people are, it’s extremely difficult to make that case,” Kraiem said. “How much does it make sense to pay for a more robust piece of infrastructure today to protect against potential damage in 30 or 40 years?”

President Barack Obama failed to win passage in Congress this year of legislation to cap carbon emissions linked to global warming. Prospects for action will grow slimmer next year when Republicans take control of the House of Representatives and expand their minority in the Senate. Dozens of Republican lawmakers elected this month have expressed skepticism about global warming or action to curb it.

‘Inevitable Effects’

Obama’s task force on climate-change adaptation is urging government agencies to prepare for the “inevitable effects” of global warming.

“We’re not looking at climate-change impacts that are far in the future,” Shere Abbott, associate director of environment for the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, said in an interview. “We’re already seeing impacts today.”

The U.S. Gulf Coast alone may face $350 billion in damages by 2030 as powerful storms fueled by climate change ravage the region, according to a study released last month that was commissioned by Entergy Corp. of New Orleans, an energy company that operates nuclear-power plants.

Texas Instruments, Siemens

Texas Instruments Inc., the second-largest U.S. chipmaker behind Intel Corp., and Siemens AG, Europe’s largest engineering company, are among companies that say increased demand for energy-efficient appliances and other business opportunities may counter risks to business from climate change such as higher energy costs, according to a report released last month by the Carbon Disclosure Project, which is backed by 534 institutional investors with more than $64 trillion in assets under management.

GE of Fairfield, Connecticut, which has pushed for mandatory carbon limits in the U.S. and worldwide, is working on a project with Goldman Sachs Group Inc. to map water-related risks for investors. GE, the world’s second-biggest wind-turbine maker behind Vestas Wind Systems A/S, also views the database as a tool to help the company identify areas worldwide where a shifting climate is causing water scarcity, said Jeff Fulgham, sustainability chief for GE Water.

“We want to make sure we are on the ground in those high- stress areas,” Fulgham said in an interview. Revenue from GE’s business recycling water for use in power plants, agriculture and manufacturing is expected to grow at least 10 percent a year through at least 2016, he said.

Levi Strauss Cotton

While some businesses seek profit in adapting to climate change, others are preparing for the liabilities.

Levi Strauss & Co. says it’s worried higher temperatures and sea levels worldwide will cause diminishing supplies and soaring costs for the cotton used in its jeans.

The apparel-maker is mapping out its operations and supply chain to see where water scarcity may cause damage now and later, said Anna Walker, the San Francisco-based company’s senior manager of government affairs and public policy.

Negotiators pledged in Copenhagen to keep the global temperature rise since industrialization to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit), part of a political pact nations settled upon after failing to reach a deal on curbing emissions. Average surface temperatures have risen by about 0.74 degrees Celsius during the 20th century, according to the UN.

Munich Re, the biggest reinsurer, and Swiss Re, the second- largest, back the 2-degree cap and say exceeding it would result in an explosion of risk.

“Adaptation needs more attention,” said Andrew Steer, the World Bank’s climate-change chief who became the first to hold the post in July. “I’m not saying adaptation is better than mitigation. It’s not. But unfortunately it’s unlikely we will be able to prevent temperatures from rising less than 2 degrees.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Kim Chipman in Washington at kchipman@bloomberg.net; Jim Efstathiou Jr. in New York at jefstathiou@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Liebert at LLiebert@bloomberg.net.


View the original article here

Sunday, January 2, 2011

TSA chief says no change in screening policy - The Associated Press

TSA chief says no change in screening policy(AP) – 2 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — The head of the Transportation Security Administration on Sunday acknowledged that new full-body scanners and thorough pat-downs can be invasive and uncomfortable, but he said that the need to stay a step ahead of terrorists rules out changes in airport screening procedures.

John Pistole told CNN's "State of the Union" that, despite the public uproar over new screening techniques, "we are not changing the policies" that he said were the best ways of keeping the traveling public safe. TSA screeners, he said, are "the last line of defense" in protecting air travelers.

Pistole's comments came after President Barack Obama on Saturday said he understood people's frustrations and had asked TSA officials whether there's a less intrusive way to screen U.S. airline passengers.

Obama said he had told the agency that "you have to constantly refine and measure whether what we're doing is the only way to assure the American people's safety."

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said she thought "everyone, including our security experts, are looking for ways to diminish the impact on the traveling public." She told NBC's "Meet the Press" that "striking the right balance is what this is about."

However, when asked on CBS' "Face the Nation" if she would submit to a pat-down, Clinton responded: "Not if I could avoid it. No. I mean, who would?"

But Pistole stressed that that balance now requires steps to confront "a determined enemy" that has proven adept in devising new ways to conceal weapons. "We know through intelligence there are determined people, terrorists, trying to kill not only Americans but innocent people around the world," he said.

Pistole was shown videos of people being patted down where the screeners touched the breasts of a woman, felt into the pants of another person and felt the crotch of a man. He said all three cases were proper and that the gloves of the screener who felt inside the pants were then tested for explosive trace residue.

A Nigerian man was accused last Christmas of trying to set off a bomb hidden in his underwear aboard a flight from Amsterdam.

"Clearly it's invasive, it's not comfortable," Pistole said, while adding that very few people receive the pat-down. People who go through the new advanced imaging machines available at some 70 airports are usually not subject to pat-downs, he said.

Passengers have also objected to the advanced imaging machines because they produce a virtually naked image of the person's body. The screener, who sits in a different location, does not see the face of the person being screened and does not know the traveler's identity.

"Clearly, if we are to detect terrorists who have proven innovative, creative in the design and implementation of bombs that are going to blow up airplanes and kill people, we have to do something to prevent that," Pistole said.

Copyright © 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.


View the original article here

Saturday, November 20, 2010

EU backs limited treaty change to ward off crises - Reuters

By Jan Strupczewski and Julien Toyer

BRUSSELS | Thu Oct 28, 2010 8:33pm EDT

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European Union on Thursday supported calls by Germany and France for limited changes to the bloc's main treaty to help shore up Europe's defenses against any new financial crises.

EU leaders agreed at a summit that changes were needed to create a permanent system to handle sovereign debt problems and endorsed tougher budget rules, including sanctions on states that do not keep deficits and debt in check.

But Berlin failed to win widespread support for demands to suspend the voting rights of member states which breach the rules. This would have required more radical treaty change and will be looked at only after the other measures are dealt with.

The leaders asked Herman Van Rompuy, the president of the EU Council grouping national governments, to prepare changes to the Lisbon treaty in time for agreement at a summit in December and said he should work on them with the European Commission.

"Today we took important decisions to strengthen the euro zone," Van Rompuy told a news conference after discussions described by several participants as heated and emotional.

"We recommend a robust and credible permanent crisis resolution mechanism to safeguard the financial stability of the euro zone as a whole."

The changes to the treaty are to be agreed by mid-2013 and are part of Europe's efforts to ensure it can cope with any repeat of the Greek sovereign debt crisis this year which threatened the future of the euro.

Germany, Europe's biggest economy, says a permanent system must replace the ad-hoc 440-billion euro safety net created in May for all euro zone states. It also says it should be partly funded by the private sector and entail strict conditions.

OVERCOMING RESISTANCE

France and Germany, the 27-country EU's dominant powers, initially faced hostility to their demands to amend the treaty to create a permanent structure for handling debt crises, enhance financial stability and support the euro.

Most leaders opposed big changes to a charter that took eight years to negotiate and became law only 10 months ago. Any change to an EU treaty must be approved unanimously and ratified by all member states, either in a vote of parliament or via a referendum. The European Parliament should also agree.

But the leaders eventually accepted, in some cases reluctantly, that small amendments were needed to protect the euro, although Britain made its backing dependent on keeping EU spending in check and Poland tied its support to a deal on pension reforms, EU diplomats said.

Any sign that the leaders were scaling back efforts to tighten budget discipline could unsettle financial markets worried by debt problems in euro zone countries such as Portugal, Ireland and Greece.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who needs strong backing for treaty change to fend off criticism at home of her handling of the euro zone crisis, told reporters that the euro and the European Union itself could be in danger.

Berlin, which wants to ensure the permanent structure has a sound legal base, had threatened to block the budget reforms if no deal was reached.


If the EU is so concerned about another Sovereign Debt issue which could cripple the Eurozone, why doesn’t it seek to charge the organizations who illegally funded money to the Greek state as an example.

Why is it that the very few politicians who abuse the right of Power are always the ones who continuously walk away from such fraud leaving behind the innocent Greek Citizens to cough up the bill?

Billions of dollars has dissapeared from the Greek books, while the Citizens are left to pay the biils, and with what money ?

I am a strong believer of the Eurozone, but perhaps to solve an issue we need to identify the core issues.

Lending Billions of dollars to such states leads to corruption and fraudelent activity by the Very Powers who where Voted in by the people.

Instead of placeing measures such as sanctions perhaps the Eurozone needs to be realistic about the actually output of these economies before such states are given Billions of Dollars to dispurse, perhaps the Eurozone should look at the banks, arent they the ones who have created this global financial crisis?
Why is it that the people should suffer from the very few Greedy Bankers?

Apollonas.

Apollonas Report As Abusive

*We welcome comments that advance the story directly or with relevant tangential information. We try to block comments that use offensive language or appear to be spam and review comments frequently to ensure they meet our standards. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters.

View the original article here