Report: Apple Mac App Store Launching Dec. 13 - PC Magazine

Apple is planning to launch its Mac App Store on December 13, an "inside source" told the blog Appletell.

Apple has reportedly told developers to have their software ready as early as today, but Appletell's source did not think it would happen that early. Delays are possible, the blog said, but there is an internal push to have the app store launched before Christmas.

Last week, Apple released some additional guidelines for the Mac App Store, including a ban on the submission of beta or trial apps, updated rules about file system usage, and suggestions for custom apps.

Apple first announced plans for the app store at the October 20 "Back to the Mac" press event. It will be included in the upcoming Lion OS (slideshow below), set to be released next year, but Apple also wanted to release a version for Snow Leopard this year. Apple started accepted submissions for the Mac App Store on November 3.

View the original article here

WikiLeaks Emerging as Hydra-Like Web Entity That`s Hard to Kill - eWeek

WikiLeaks Emerging as Hydra-Like Web Entity That`s Hard to Kill
( Page 1 of 2 ) WikiLeaks keeps finding ways to stay online even as it gets hit with repeated denial-of-service attacks aimed at keeping people from accessing the site and despite decisions by technology and financial companies to terminate essential services. 

With each passing day it?s getting harder to shut WeakiLeaks down, according to technology experts. ?The harder you hit them, the bigger they get,? wrote James Cowie, CTO at Internet monitoring firm Renesys. 

In the past ten days since WikiLeaks began publishing thousands of leaked U.S diplomatic messages, Amazon has cancelled its hosting service, everyDNS terminated its domain name server services, and PayPal, PostFinance, MasterCard and Visa Europe have frozen its accounts.  

WikiLeaks continues to be hit by DOS attacks to shut down the site with the first attack hitting hours before it published the first batch of diplomatic messages. Instead of relying on just one domain name service provider, the site currently has 14 name servers from 11 different providers in eight different countries, including Switzerland, Germany, Canada, and Malaysia, listed in its WHOIS information.  

WikiLeaks has a number of other top-level domains in case WikiLeaks.ch gets knocked off line, including France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, and Iceland. The geo-diversification makes it very hard to take WikiLeaks down, wrote Cowie. 

Shortly after US-based DNS provider everyDNS terminated service, easyDNS CEO said the company would be willing to work with WikiLeaks provided certain conditions were met. As the company was based in Toronto, easyDNS would not be subject to U.S. laws ?with respect to takedown requests,? said Mark Jeftovic.

As of Dec. 8, WikiLeaks.ch listed two easyDNS name servers. EasyDNS is also serving other WikiLeaks domains, according to Jeftovic. Last week, WikiLeaks.nl listed Nevada-based Rollernut for DNS, which has been replaced by EasyDNS. 

The DNS for WikiLeaks is ?confined? to the Prolexic anycast nameserver, said Jeftovic. The four servers, deployed in ?London, Hong Kong and on the east and west coasts of North America,? were selected because Prolexic specializes in ?soaking up DOS attacks? and they do that ?very well,? he wrote. Even anticipating that WikiLeaks will be attacked, everyDNS is ?confident? that there will be ?little effect? on other customer domains or even on WikiLeaks, Jeftovic said. 

Now that WikiLeaks is ?spreading in a multi-mirrored fashion, it?s really gone hydra now,? he wrote. ?There?s no center of gravity? for attackers to take out, he said. 

View the original article here

In political gamble, Reid holds Senate votes he knows he'll lose - Washington Post

On Wednesday afternoon, the most powerful man in the U.S. Senate did something that sounds odd: He set himself up to lose an important vote.

Then he did it again, on another key issue.

And Thursday he'll do it two more times.

Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) planned votes where his favored bills were expected to fail. For Reid, failure is actually the point. He wants to put Republicans on record as blocking all four.

On Wednesday, he took up seniors' benefits and collective- bargaining rights for police and firefighters' unions, and on Thursday he will call votes on an immigration bill that would assist people who were brought to the United States illegally as children, and legislation that would provide health-care benefits for responders to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

These "test votes" are a sign of the sclerotic state of Congress, clogged by filibuster threats. Usually, it is the people out of power who resort to grand, futile gestures.

Now - in a political gamble - it's the guys in charge.

"Just because the party of 'Just say no' has been blocking all these initiatives, it doesn't mean we're not going to try," said Jim Manley, a spokesman for Reid. "At some point, you've got to take a stand, and let the chips fall where they may."

Senate Democrats, who hold a majority in the chamber, held their last "test vote" on Saturday - two, actually. The first proposal called for an end to tax cuts, passed under President George W. Bush, on income greater than $250,000 for a family.

Democrats needed 60 senators to agree. They got just 53.

Then Democratic leaders staged a vote to let the tax cuts expire only for income of more than $1 million per year for a family. That failed, too.

In theory, these votes were supposed to demonstrate that Republicans were favoring the rich at the expense of the middle class.

View the original article here